630
edits
Carmentalia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Ovid: Update Carmentis -> Carmenta to match the rest of the article
No edit summary |
m (→Ovid: Update Carmentis -> Carmenta to match the rest of the article) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
[[Ovid]] states that the two dates may be linked by a protest of the matrons of Rome in {{Roman Year|-195}}. During the fourth century the Roman Senate had granted patrician matrons the privilege of riding in two- wheeled carriages (carpentum) in reward for their contribution in gold to fulfilling a vow to Apollo made by Camillus. The privilege was later to be temporarily revoked during the Second Punic War (215 BCE) along with sumptuary laws that limited the use of colored cloth and gold that women could wear, in order to save on private expenses and war materials (horses) and thus help in the war effort. But the Senate did not at first renew the privileges at war's end. In 195 Tribunes Marcus Fundanius and Lucius Valerius finally called for the repeal of this lex Oppia, but they were opposed by the brothers Marcus and Publius Junius Brutus. Supporters for repealing the lex Oppia, and those who supported its remaining in effect, gathered daily on the Capitoline to argue over the matter. Soon women began to join in the disputes, their numbers increasing daily, even so much as women from the countryside entered into the City to advocate for their rights. The natural place for them to first congregate would have been at the grove of Carmentis. This may be what Ovid indicates by linking the protest to the Carmentalia. Consul Marcius Porcius Cato spoke out against repealing the lex Oppia. The women then resolved to "refuse to renew their ungrateful husbands' stock" until their privileges were restored, Ovid referring to the women resorting to abortion as their means of protest.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ovidius Nāsō |first=Pūblius |title=Fāstī |language=Latin}}</ref> | [[Ovid]] states that the two dates may be linked by a protest of the matrons of Rome in {{Roman Year|-195}}. During the fourth century the Roman Senate had granted patrician matrons the privilege of riding in two- wheeled carriages (carpentum) in reward for their contribution in gold to fulfilling a vow to Apollo made by Camillus. The privilege was later to be temporarily revoked during the Second Punic War (215 BCE) along with sumptuary laws that limited the use of colored cloth and gold that women could wear, in order to save on private expenses and war materials (horses) and thus help in the war effort. But the Senate did not at first renew the privileges at war's end. In 195 Tribunes Marcus Fundanius and Lucius Valerius finally called for the repeal of this lex Oppia, but they were opposed by the brothers Marcus and Publius Junius Brutus. Supporters for repealing the lex Oppia, and those who supported its remaining in effect, gathered daily on the Capitoline to argue over the matter. Soon women began to join in the disputes, their numbers increasing daily, even so much as women from the countryside entered into the City to advocate for their rights. The natural place for them to first congregate would have been at the grove of Carmentis. This may be what Ovid indicates by linking the protest to the Carmentalia. Consul Marcius Porcius Cato spoke out against repealing the lex Oppia. The women then resolved to "refuse to renew their ungrateful husbands' stock" until their privileges were restored, Ovid referring to the women resorting to abortion as their means of protest.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ovidius Nāsō |first=Pūblius |title=Fāstī |language=Latin}}</ref> | ||
Carmenta had a [[flamen]] ([[Flamen Carmentalis]]) of her own. Ovid suggests that the pontiffs were involved in this festival and that the flamen provided a sacrifice on the | Carmenta had a [[flamen]] ([[Flamen Carmentalis]]) of her own. Ovid suggests that the pontiffs were involved in this festival and that the flamen provided a sacrifice on the Carmentalia. The skins of animals were excluded from shrines to Carmenta. Varro reports that at shrines nothing dead might be brought in. Is is probable that violation of this taboo may result in the birth of dead children. | ||
In a later period the Temple of the Bona Dea would become associated with the use of abortive herbs, and | In a later period the Temple of the [[Bona Dea]] would become associated with the use of abortive herbs, and Carmenta associated with the use of the same herbs in birthing. In actuality both Carmenta and the Bona Dea were associated with birthing or prevention of pregnancy, and the difference between the Capitoline and Aventine temples may have been one of class distinction. Eventually the matrons of Rome regained their rights and, according to Ovid, the second Carmentalia was then begun in thanks to the Goddess for Her support. Ovid's story is the least likely and most fanciful to account for the two Carmentaliae of January even as it provides another aspect to the story told by Livy. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||